<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>PoliticalRef.com</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalref.com</link>
		<description>Thorough poll averages and political news and analysis</description>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<generator>Jitbit RSS Feed Creator</generator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:17:48 -0400</pubDate>
		<item><title>Obama and Romney Continue in Virtual Dead Heat</title><description><![CDATA[<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_romney.php">Among Adults and Voters</A></P>
<P><STRONG>Obama Leads by 2.5%</STRONG></P>
<P>Obama 46.7</P>
<P>Romney 44.2</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_romney.php">Among Voters Only</A></P>
<P><STRONG>Obama Leads by 2.3%</STRONG></P>
<P>Obama 46.8</P>
<P>Romney 44.5</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_romney.php</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Obama expands significant lead over Santorum</title><description><![CDATA[<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_santorum.php">Among Adults and Voters</A></P>
<P><STRONG>Obama Leads by 7.8%</STRONG></P>
<P>Obama 49.0</P>
<P>Romney 41.2</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_santorum.php">Among Voters Only</A></P>
<P><STRONG>Obama Leads by 6.9%</STRONG></P>
<P>Obama 49.2</P>
<P>Romney 42.3</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>.]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_santorum.php</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Americans see nation's direction worsening</title><description><![CDATA[<P>In the last two weeks, more Americans see the nation heading on the wrong track.&nbsp; This change came as the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its unemployment numbers for February, which showed a gain of over 200,000 jobs and an unemployment of 8.3%, staying the same as the previous month.</P>
<P>There seems to be a disconnect between the percepction of the public and the White House narrative and predominant media storyline.&nbsp; Either unemployment is not the biggest problem or it is worse than the BLS is reporting.&nbsp; </P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/right_wrong.php">61.3% Wrong Track</A></P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/right_wrong.php">31.8% Right Track</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/right_wrong.php</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:17:48 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Obama Approval Dives - Reuters and Pew Release Bogus Polls</title><description><![CDATA[<P>TEMPTING TO SAY - The polls from the NYT and WaPo in the last couple of days scared the Democrats so bad that someone called Pew and Reuters and told them to get something out to limit the damage.&nbsp; </P>
<P>REALITY - The reality is that we don't know anything like that to be true, but we know it looks suspicious.&nbsp; If Pew and Ipsos had not both come in with samples of over 50% Democrats, it would not look suspicious.&nbsp; But oddly, very strangely, they both came out with such polls within twelve hours of each other.&nbsp; The professionals at these organizations know that the polls they released last night and today are inaccurate.&nbsp; They should not have released them or should have weighted them to reflect the actual population.&nbsp; That they did not tells us something.&nbsp; You can see my analysis <A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/pres_approv.php">here</A>.</P>
<P><BR><STRONG><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/pres_approv.php">Obama Approval Among Adults and Voters</A></STRONG></P>
<P>45.8 Approve</P>
<P>48.4 Disapprove</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P><STRONG><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/pres_approv.php">Obama Approval Among Voters Only</A></STRONG></P>
<P>47.0 Approve</P>
<P>52.0 Disapprove</P>
<P><BR>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/pres_approv.php</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:01:25 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Newt admits he may not win anymore states</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Newt's inability to answer this question demonstrates that he is a defeated candidate.&nbsp;He would have loved to throw out Texas, but he couldn't even win the neighboring state to Georgia.&nbsp;He was running a southern&nbsp;and Texas strategy.&nbsp;He essentially admitted that even his Texas&nbsp;strategy is now defunct.</P>
<P>There is a great article in the Mail Online today.&nbsp;It makes clear that Newt really has no reason to stay in&nbsp;this race.&nbsp;Link below:</P>
<P><A href="http://harndenblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/03/delusional-newt-outlines-his-strategy-to-stop-mitt-romney-sabotage-at-tampa.html">Delusional Newt outlines his strategy to stop Mitt Romney: Sabotage at Tampa</A></P>
<P>To openly advocate for a convention fight demonstrates that Newt puts himself before his country and party.&nbsp;It's not hyperbole.&nbsp;It's true.&nbsp;One cannot make a credible argument where a convention fight helps the Republican party&nbsp;in its quest to defeat Obama.&nbsp;</P>
<P>Right now, Newt Gingrich is Barack Obama's best weapon.&nbsp;</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/permalink/12--03-14_newt_cant_win_state.php">See Newt&nbsp;admit he doesn't know where he can win</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/permalink/12--03-14_newt_cant_win_state.php</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:30:57 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Newt's Petulence</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Newt's Petulence</P>
<P>After losing two southern states, the self-proclaimed southern candidate Newt Gingrich has no chance of winning the nomination, even if he gets his wish and the GOP goes to the convention without a nominee.&nbsp;He nevertheless insists that he will remain in the race with the goal of creating a "conversation" that will take place after the last primary on June 26th.&nbsp;He thinks that one of the four existing candidates, or perhaps someone new, would be granted the nomination by the consent of the remaining delegate holders.</P>
<P>Of course this is nonsense, but Newt is looking for any justification to keep the dream alive, the dream that he dove headfirst into when he took the lead in the polls in Iowa.&nbsp;Remember when Newt declared that he would be the nominee before a single vote had been cast, when he had only been leading in the polls&nbsp;for a matter of days?&nbsp;</P>
<P>It is becoming apparent that Newt is not primarily the man of ideas or the true conservative, although he is those things, but is first and foremost a self-promoter interested primarily in making the history he so loves to study.&nbsp;Who will tell him it's over?&nbsp;The&nbsp;GOP had better hope his money, voter support or both dry up to the point that even Newt has to&nbsp;drop out.&nbsp;Otherwise Newt&nbsp;will not only have lost his dream of being president, but his nightmare of an Obama reelection will likely come true as well.&nbsp;A splintered GOP can recover if it has several months to forget about the wounds developed in this process, but if it only has sixty days, Obama can probably put a victory together while angry Republicans tune the enitre process out.&nbsp;</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com">See Newt's Speech</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:58:57 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Comparing the GOP Nominees Against Obama, Romney fares Best</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Obama leads all three GOP nominees, but the race against Romney is nearly tied.</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_vs_obama.php">See the chart here that makes the point well</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_vs_obama.php</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:18:42 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Obama continues to lead Santorum</title><description><![CDATA[<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_santorum.php">Among Adults and Voters</A></P>
<P><STRONG>Obama Leads by 5.4%</STRONG></P>
<P>Obama 48.0</P>
<P>Romney 42.6</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_santorum.php">Among Voters Only</A></P>
<P><STRONG>Obama Leads by 5.4%</STRONG></P>
<P>Obama 48.2</P>
<P>Romney 42.8</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>.]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_santorum.php</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:03:00 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Obama and Romney are Virtually Even in Head-to-Head</title><description><![CDATA[<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_romney.php">Among Adults and Voters</A></P>
<P><STRONG>Obama Leads by 1.4%</STRONG></P>
<P>Obama 46.2</P>
<P>Romney 44.8</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_romney.php">Among Voters Only</A></P>
<P><STRONG>Obama Leads by 1.2%</STRONG></P>
<P>Obama 46.4</P>
<P>Romney 45.2</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_romney.php</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:33:00 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>GOP National Numbers Tightening</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Romney held a double digit lead a week ago, but that lead has dropped to single digits.&nbsp; The high his numbers experienced following an impressive Super Tuesday were likely to drop as the hard slog of the nomination fight retook center stage. </P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_nom.php">Romney +5.0 Among Adults and Voters</A></P>
<P>Romney 33.8</P>
<P>Santorum 28.8</P>
<P>Gingrich 14.8</P>
<P>Paul 11.2</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_nom.php">Romney +4.4 Among Voters Only</A></P>
<P>Romney 33.7</P>
<P>Santorum 29.3</P>
<P>Gingrich 15.7</P>
<P>Paul 10.0</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_nom.php</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:55:50 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Alabama</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Anybody's game in Alabama</P>
<P>Gingrich 27.0</P>
<P>Romney 26.3</P>
<P>Santorum 25.0</P>
<P>Paul 7.5</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/al_gop.php">See the latest polls</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/al_gop.php</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:50:57 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Mississipi - Romney leads in final polls</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Romney up by 3 points going into Tuesday's primary.&nbsp; If he wins in Mississippi, it would be&nbsp;a surprise.&nbsp; </P>
<P>Romney 33.0</P>
<P>Gingrich 30.0</P>
<P>Santorum 27.0</P>
<P>Paul 6.5</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/ms_gop.php">See the latest numbers</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/ms_gop.php</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:49:34 -0400</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Romney Running Even With Obama</title><description><![CDATA[<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_romney.php">Obama 47.5&nbsp;vs. Romney 45.5</A></P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_santorum.php">Obama 50.0 vs. Santorum 41.5</A></P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_vs_obama.php">Romney polling much better against Obama than Santorum, Gingrich</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/obama_romney.php</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:38:52 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Romney Ahead in Mississippi</title><description><![CDATA[<P><STRONG>Romnney is up by eight points in Mississippi</STRONG>.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
<P>Romney 35.0</P>
<P>Gingrich 27.0</P>
<P>Santorum 27.0</P>
<P>Paul 6.0</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/ms_gop.php">See the poll and image chart here</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/ms_gop.php</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:36:52 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Alabama a Three-Way Tie</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Gingrich 25.5<BR>Romney 24.0<BR>Santorum 23.0<BR>Paul 7.0</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/al_gop.php">See the Polls and Chart Here</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/al_gop.php</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:34:34 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>The Obama-Bell Video is a Test of the Viewer that MSM Journalists Fail</title><description><![CDATA[<P>One could look at the video and see an idealistic law student supporting a professor he understandably identifies with&nbsp;because they are both blacks in the legal community.&nbsp;As a lawyer, I can tell you that there&nbsp;are very few blacks in the legal community now and were significantly fewer in 1991.&nbsp;It is genuinely harder to live day-to-day in law school if you are black.&nbsp;There are social and professional dynamics at play that make life harder, dynamics which are probably magnified because the social pool is full of hyper-ambitious sharks.&nbsp;These ambitious ones may support racial diversity in both word and thought, but when faced with the decision of who to socialize with or partner with in study groups, a white law student is primarily factoring his or her professional future into the equation, and that usually leaves the black kid out.&nbsp;It's all about rank in law school, race be damned.&nbsp;Unfortunately, this view ignores the reality that Obama was taking sides within the black legal community, siding with the radical racialist view and abandoning the rational one.&nbsp; </P>
<P>Derrick Bell harshly attacked a fellow black professor at Harvard, a man named Randall Kennedy, before Obama spoke on his behalf.&nbsp;Bell attacked Kennedy for questioning the radical racial assumptions academics like Bell adopt, such as the assumption that whites are inherently racist and incapable of genuine good will toward blacks, that whites will only treat blacks equally if their own self-interest is benefitted.&nbsp;Obama did nothing to defend Kennedy, but apparently took sides with Bell, the crusading racial leftist.&nbsp;Kennedy is no conservative, or what some racialists might term an "uncle Tom," by the way.&nbsp;He has written three books on race and the law.&nbsp;He just didn't adopt the most radical racial assumptions out there, which apparently Barack Obama did. </P>
<P>One might assume that an idealistic young law student understandably sides with an academic who puts diversity of thought as his top priority and fights for it.&nbsp;Again, unfortunately, Bell was fighting to make the already liberal academic establishment more radically left, not more diverse.&nbsp;This fact is underscored by Bell's later firing from the Oregon law school.&nbsp;His view of diversity required hiring only leftist black professors, and even the liberal law school at Oregon could not go along with this.&nbsp;Obama apparently thought that academia needed to be more liberal.&nbsp;If liberal academia was not liberal enough for Obama, he must have been pretty far to the left.&nbsp; </P>
<P>One&nbsp;inclined to give Obama the benefit of the doubt might assume&nbsp;that because all of&nbsp;this happened when he was a kid&nbsp;over twenty years ago, it's irrelevant.&nbsp;This take ignores the fact that Obama was an adult leading the most respected law review in the nation.&nbsp;A person in this position should be held accountable for his or her positions.&nbsp;Students in law&nbsp;schools are held to extremely high academic standards and are expected to defend their positions.&nbsp;Obama knew what he was doing.&nbsp;The fact that this was twenty years ago is also negated by the fact that Obama continued to have a relationship with Bell until he died last year.&nbsp; </P>
<P>Whether one views this video as innocuous&nbsp;or like a red flag will be based on the assumptions he or she brings to viewing it.&nbsp;It seems that Breitbart may have thought that throwing this Rorschach test out there represented the best course for starting this vetting process.&nbsp;It&nbsp;draws out the journalists who will be willing to at least listen to an honest vetting of Obama and those who are steadfastly against any vetting.&nbsp;Knowing who these people are will be useful. </P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/permalink/12--03-08_obama_bell_video_rorschach_test.php">See the Videos of Obama, Bell, Sowell and Kennedy Here</A></P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/permalink/12--03-08_obama_bell_video_rorschach_test.php</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:19:40 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Unemployment on the Rise</title><description><![CDATA[Unemployment claims jumped to 362,000 last week, in the first sign that hiring is not strong in four weeks.&nbsp; This number will almost certainly be revised up, as seemingly happens almost every week.&nbsp; The previous week's estimate of 351,000 was revised up to 354,000, an adjustment that is relevant because 350,000 is the magic number for sustained growth, and now we have two weeks in a row where we are an average of 8000 claims above that number.&nbsp; The Gallup poll is <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/125639/Gallup-Daily-Workforce.aspx" target="_blank">showing that unemployment spiked back up to 9.1% this month</a>.&nbsp; Gallup's numbers always show up earlier than those of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.&nbsp; We will see what the Bureau of Labor Statistics says tomorrow.</p>
            <table width="100%" border="0">
              <tr>
                <td width="21%"><strong>Date</strong></td>
                <td width="22%"><strong>Actual</strong></td>
                <td width="25%"><strong>Initial Report</strong></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td><strong>3/8</strong></td>
                <td>&nbsp;</td>
                <td><strong>362k</strong></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td><strong>3/1</strong></td>
                <td><strong>354k</strong></td>
                <td><strong>351k</strong></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td><strong>2/23</strong></td>
                <td><strong>353k</strong></td>
                <td><strong>351k</strong></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td><strong>2/16</strong></td>
                <td><strong>351k</strong></td>
                <td><strong>348k</strong></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td><strong>2/9</strong></td>
                <td><strong>361k</strong></td>
                <td><strong>358k</strong></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td><strong>2/2</strong></td>
                <td><strong>373k</strong></td>
                <td>&nbsp;</td>
              </tr>
            </table>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:22:15 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>After Super Tuesday, Continued Santorum-Gingrich fight likely secures Romney victory</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Based on Tuesday's results, it looks like as long as Gingrich and Santorum stay in the race, Romney will win enough delegates to win the nomination.&nbsp; </P>
<P>Romney won about 56% of the delegates available on Tuesday and finished in first or second place in every state.&nbsp;No other candidate finished in first or second place in every state.&nbsp;Romney also won six of the ten contests, including two of the three biggest states.&nbsp;Gingrich won the other one.&nbsp; </P>
<P>For Santorum supporters looking for Gingrich to drop out, you can forget it.&nbsp;A prominent Gingrich advisor said that instead of Gingrich dropping out, Romney should drop out.&nbsp;That statement should tell Santorum supporters that the Gingrich campaign is not about&nbsp;the conservative movement, it's about Newt's ego.&nbsp;That kind of emotional and irrational response tells you they are involved in a cult of personality.&nbsp;So don't hold your breath waiting for Newt to drop out.&nbsp;Why should he?&nbsp;His biggest supporter, Sarah Palin, who just won't admit it but backs him, said that anyone asking Newt to drop out is whining.&nbsp;With Palin&nbsp;giving Newt cover, it's hard to see how the social conservatives backing Santorum can brow beat Newt enough to get out.&nbsp; </P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com">See the Video of Palin Defending Newt Here</A></P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:54:44 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>GOP Nomination: National</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Romney continues to hold a substantial national lead. Romney's six wins on Tuesday, including Ohio, should only buttress his national lead. </P>
<P>Romney 38.3</P>
<P>Santorum 26.3</P>
<P>Gingrich 14.3</P>
<P>Paul 12.0</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_nom.php">Click Here for Latest Polls and Image Chart</A></P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_nom.php</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:48:22 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Scarborough's Gloom is Ridiculous</title><description><![CDATA[<P>RomneyCare is not ObamaCare. Regardless of whether Romney ever argued for a national individual mandate, it is a state program in a federal system, which makes all the difference. States have a great deal more power than the federal government to impose on their citizens. Scarborough simply does not know what he is talking about or is intentionally trashing Republicans. Besides that, even if Romney actually wrote and gave the bill to Obama, which of course is absurd, he would still be the guy who is going to repeal it, and that's all that matters. This country wants the bill gone and Romney is the guy who will do it. The best Obama can do is call Romney a hypocrite at which point the country will say, no, really, a hypocritical politician? They will then loudly say, who cares! Repeal this disaster of a bill! </P>
<P>The state of the GOP is really not as bad as Scarborough says. Joe's gloom is based on the tough presidential nominating contest the GOP is having and his perception of the field of candidates as weak. But this ignores the reason for Romney's perceived weakness. Romney is viewed as weak because he has not locked up the nomination yet. He has not locked it up because conservatives have not supported him while moderates and independents have supported him strongly, at least until recently. Independents don't like bitter party fights, so they have pulled back. That's why they are independents. There is no reason to think independents won't come back once the nomination is his. He is not hurt by the social issues debate. </P>
<P>The real reason Romney has suffered is because he has never decided to "catch his hair on fire" to excite the right, as he put it. He is still perceived as reasonable and competent because he has not taken the bait from the red meat craving right. Last, the right is going to vote for whoever the GOP nominates because they will be voting against Obama. No force is stronger in politics than voting against someone. This fact guarantees that all those folks voting against Romney in the primaries will be flying his flag higher than anyone else come November. Doubt that? Gingrich never fails to make perfectly clear that he will strongly support whoever the GOP nominates. If Gingrich can say that, then even the most emotional partisan conservative will say the same thing. So when the independents come back and the right joins with Romney, he will be a very strong nominee, perhaps the strongest since 1984. I suspect Joe knows this. He likes to bait the left wings goofs he works with. </P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com">See the videos Here </A></P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:22:01 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Ohio</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Romney pulled ahead by more than a point as the final polls came in. Romney has been trending up slowly after leaping into a virtual dead heat just after the Michigan primary. The slow movement up is a good sign, but this can go eitiher way and will be close.&nbsp; There are numerous polls, so the polling should be accurate in Ohio.</P>
<P>Romney&nbsp;33.9 <BR>Santorum&nbsp;32.7 <BR>Gingrich&nbsp;16.4 <BR>Paul 11.3 </P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/oh_gop.php">See Latest Poll Numbers Image Chart</A></P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/oh_gop.php</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:34:21 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Georgia</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Gingrich will easily win Georgia, but the race is for second where Romney looks strong</P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/ga_gop.php">See the Latest Image Chart and Polls</A>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/ga_gop.php</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:15:58 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Tennessee</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Santorum, shockingly, could lose Tennessee to Romney on Tuesday.&nbsp; The latest poll averages show this race to be a dead heat.</P>
<P>Santorum 32.3<BR>Romney 29.7<BR>Gingrich 24.7&nbsp;<BR>Paul 9.3%</P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/tn_gop.php">See the Latest Image Chart and Polls</A></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/tn_gop.php</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:13:10 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Ohio</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Romney pulls ahead, but only barely</P>
<P>Romney&nbsp;33.5 <BR>Santorum&nbsp;33.3 <BR>Gingrich&nbsp;14.5 <BR>Paul 12.3 </P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/oh_gop.php">See Latest Image Chart</A></P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/state_polls/oh_gop.php</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:11:50 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>GOP National Nomination</title><description><![CDATA[<P>Romney 38.7 </P>
<P>Santorum 26.0 </P>
<P>Gingrich 14.7 </P>
<P>Paul 12.3 </P>
<P><A href="http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_nom.php">See Line Chart</A></P>]]></description><link>http://politicalref.com/poll_center/gop_nom.php</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:09:38 -0500</pubDate></item>
		<item><title>Tennessee Surprisingly Close Between Romney and Santorum </title><description>After Romney pulled out a victory in Michigan, everyone expected Ohio to develop into a horserace. But Tennessee was not supposed to be on Romney's list of possible states. But Romney is within three points of Santorum and is ahead of Gingrich in Tennessee. If Romney steals Tennessee from Santorum, perhaps that will offset a narrow loss in Ohio. Or if Romney is able to win both, Romney will go a good distance toward ending this process tomorrow.

In Ohio, it's looking like it will come down to a point or two. With Santorum being ineligible for 18 of the Ohio's 60+ delegates, Romney has a very strong chance of winning more delegates in Ohio. Because of this, it seems like Romney is certain to have a winning narrative after Tuesday, no matter what the popular vote result in Ohio. After winning Washington, which Santorum had hoped to take, Romney looks to be in the driver's seat. Santorum is losing chances to retake the narrative.</description><link>http://politicalref.com</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate></item></channel>
</rss>
